|
Stigma,
shame, and blame experienced by patients with lung cancer:
qualitative study
A Chapple, senior
research fellow,1 S Ziebland, senior research
fellow,1 and A McPherson, research lecturer1
1
DIPEx Research Group, Department of Primary Health Care,
University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LF
Correspondence to: A Chapple
alison.chapple@dphpc.ox.ac.uk
Abstract
Objectives To draw on narrative
interviews with patients with lung cancer and to explore their
perceptions and experience of stigma.
Design Qualitative study.
Setting United Kingdom.
Participants 45 patients with lung
cancer recruited through several sources.
Results Participants experienced
stigma commonly felt by patients with other types of cancer,
but, whether they smoked or not, they felt particularly
stigmatised because the disease is so strongly associated with
smoking. Interaction with family, friends, and doctors was often
affected as a result, and many patients, particularly those who
had stopped smoking years ago or had never smoked, felt unjustly
blamed for their illness. Those who resisted victim blaming
maintained that the real culprits were tobacco companies with
unscrupulous policies. Some patients concealed their illness,
which sometimes had adverse financial consequences or made it
hard for them to gain support from other people. Some indicated
that newspaper and television reports may have added to the
stigma: television advertisements aim to put young people off
tobacco, but they usually portray a dreadful death, which may
exacerbate fear and anxiety. A few patients were worried that
diagnosis, access to care, and research into lung cancer might
be adversely affected by the stigma attached to the disease and
those who smoke.
Conclusion
Patients with lung cancer report stigmatisation with far
reaching consequences. Efforts to help people to quit smoking
are important, but clinical and educational interventions should
be presented with care so as not to add to the stigma
experienced by patients with lung cancer and other smoking
related diseases
Introduction
Stigma occurs when society labels someone
as tainted, less desirable, or handicapped This negative
evaluation may be “felt” or “enacted.” A felt negative
evaluation refers to the shame associated with having a
condition and to the fear of being discriminated against on the
grounds of imputed inferiority or social unacceptability. An
enacted negative evaluation refers to actual discrimination of
this kind. Stigma can lead to feelings of guilt, shame, and
spoiled identity. It may increase the stress associated with
illness and contribute to psychological and social morbidity.3
Stigma may also threaten personal identity, social life, and
economic opportunities and can profoundly affect families and
significant others. The stigma associated with disease depends
on whether or not the patient is held responsible for the
disease and whether the disease leads to serious disability,
disfigurement, lack of control, or disruption of social
interactions. Some research suggests that stigma ascribed to
controllable factors elicits a greater negative reaction than
stigma ascribed to uncontrollable factors.
In the Western world any diagnosis of
cancer can be associated with fear and stigma. This may be
because the cause of cancer is not always understood and is
often seen as a death sentence. According to Sontag, cancer is
often “felt to be obscene—in the original meaning of that word:
ill-omened, abominable, and repugnant to the senses.” Others
have shown that cancer can attract stigma that has a huge effect
on people's lives. Patients may experience their bodies as
“permeable, vulnerable, and out of control,” and some feel they
have to protect others from embarrassment. Treatments often lead
to hair loss, scars, or other bodily changes, which may add to
the stigma.
Care and sensitivity is needed by healthcare professionals when
treating patients with illnesses that are considered
self-inflicted. Since 1950 evidence has shown that cigarette
smoking is directly responsible for at least 90% of lung
cancers. With notable exceptions, there have been few in-depth
qualitative studies of patients with lung cancer and even fewer
studies of their perceptions and experience of stigma. Comments
by psychology students on vignettes indicates that young people
with lung cancer are likely to experience more stigma and
greater negative reactions than older people, but little is
known about the stigma experienced or felt by patients
themselves and how this may affect their lives. During our study
of people's experience of lung cancer, conducted partly to
contribute to the DIPEx (personal experiences of health and
illness) website (www.dipex.org),
the subject of stigma was often raised spontaneously and emerged
as an important theme. We analysed the perceptions and
experiences of stigma in the accounts of patients with lung
cancer and considered the possible consequences for clinical
care and anti-smoking campaigns.
Table 1
Characteristics of 45 patients interviewed about their lung
cancer
|
Characteristic |
No of people |
|
Age at interview: |
|
|
40-50 |
9 |
|
51-60 |
20 |
|
61-70 |
11 |
|
71-80 |
4 |
|
80-90 |
1 |
|
Ethnicity: |
|
|
White British |
44 |
|
Indian |
1 |
|
Type of work*:
|
|
|
Professional or higher
managerial |
14 |
|
Other non-manual |
15 |
|
Skilled manual |
9 |
|
Manual |
7 |
|
Type of cancer: |
|
|
Non-small cell |
14 |
|
Small cell |
10 |
|
Mesothelioma |
4 |
|
Not known to patients |
17 |
|
Source of recruitment: |
|
|
Support group |
24 |
|
Chest physician, oncologist, or
nurse specialist |
9 |
|
General practitioner |
7 |
|
Other† |
5 |
Methods
We interviewed 45 patients with lung cancer
throughout the United Kingdom. To look at experience in all
stages of lung cancer, our maximum variation sample included men
and women, young and older, from various social backgrounds;
people diagnosed as having small cell lung cancer, non-small
cell lung cancer; and mesothelioma, and people who had been
medically treated in different ways (table).
Originally we aimed to include about 40 patients, but we
continued interviewing until we obtained the sample described.
People were invited to participate through general practices,
oncologists, chest physicians, and support groups.
With informed consent, one of the authors
(AC, a medical sociologist), interviewed patients in their homes
between October 2002 and August 2003. Patients were asked to
tell their story from when they first suspected they had a
problem. Among other things, we were interested in people's
perception of the cause of their illness and how others reacted
to the diagnosis. Many patients talked about stigma and
expressed feelings of guilt or shame. The interviews lasted one
to three hours and were audiotaped.
Transcribed transcripts were returned to each respondent for
revision if necessary. From the transcripts we developed
categories or themes.21
Sections of text were marked and linked to sections of text from
other interviews that covered similar issues or experiences by
using NUD*IST. Themes were considered in the context
of all the interviews.2324
Inter-rater reliability scores were not developed as the
interviews had little structure—such scores are not appropriate
to data that have little or no predefined coding25;
AC and SZ regularly discussed the coding and interpretation of
the dataResults
Patient's experience and fear of stigma
Many of the patients recalled that during
their illness people often crossed the road to avoid contact.
They gave several explanations for this, such as others' desire
to avoid those who have a disease associated with a horrible
death—a disease with symptoms such as “gasping for air”; being
embarrassed; and not knowing what to say:
When I first had it [cancer] certain people
that I've known, I mean I've lived on this estate for nearly 40,
well just over 40 years, and certain people will almost cross
the road not to talk to you because I think they were frightened
of what to say, didn't know how to treat you... That makes you
feel very uncomfortable. (LC28, retired fire fighter, aged 55,
recruited through support group)
Some patients said that family or friends
had not been in touch since they heard about the diagnosis. One
patient with mesothelioma said that his daughter had not
telephoned because she felt “dirtied” by contact with cancer:
Because we don't understand it, because
there's no way of understanding cancer. Um, it's something that
grows within certain people and there's something disgusting
about it (laughs).. .because it's not nice, I suppose, you know,
it's just something that's, um, it's cells that are some sort of
“misformation.” I think there's an association, not dirtiness in
terms of “I need to Hoover it up” or “I need to get the
dishcloth out” but just dirty in the sense that “I need to keep
away from it, I want to remove myself from it.” (LC38, managing
director, aged 62, recruited through specialist nurse) This
behaviour might be understood in the light of a general dislike
of “matter out of place” (the need for clear classifications and
boundaries), and a fear of “courtesy stigma” (the common fear
that stigma may affect other people).
People's experience of other diseases may
make them wary. A woman who had had epilepsy explained why she
feared stigma and its consequences and why she did not want to
join a support group or tell others outside the family about her
cancer:
When my children were quite young I had a
major fit and I was diagnosed as having epilepsy... And when a
particular friend of mine found out it was almost as though I
had some terrible disease that was catching to everyone and
stopped her children seeing my children very abruptly... It
really made me feel very uncomfortable, took me quite a while to
get over that and I wonder if that's at the back of it, people's
reaction... I don't feel I'd take that chance. (LC25, housewife,
aged 62, recruited through a consultant)
The experience of stigma in lung cancer is
shaped by the association between the disease and smoking, the
perception of the disease as a self-inflicted injury, its high
death rate, and the type of death. Television advertisements
about smoking cessation often conclude by saying that the
patient shown has died. They upset one woman because they had
made her fear a dreadful death through drowning:
I hate those adverts that come on the
television when they finish it by saying two weeks after this
she died. And one of them said when you've got lung cancer you
drowned. And I said to the nurse, I was really offended by this,
well by all of them. I know they're to stop people smoking but
they're not pleasant to watch when you've got lung cancer.
(LC39, retired clerk, aged 73, recruited through support group)
People with other cancers experience
stigmatisation too. One woman contrasted lung cancer with other
cancers, in particular perceptions of the unpleasant symptoms
and the belief that people are dirty and blameworthy because
they smoke:
Respondent: I think they [others] are
frightened... it's like when you get a death in the family,
people will cross the road so as not to actually have to bring
up the subject, and I think it's the same with cancer.
Interviewee: Do you think it's the same
with all cancers or more so with lung cancer?
Respondent: I think more so with lung
cancer because people think you're dirty because you smoked. But
I don't think they really realise it's not only from smoking,
there's other things that it's caused by. But also I think that
they can't bear to think that they're going to see you suffer.
With a lot of cancers you don't actually suffer, with lung
cancer your breathing is very bad and you're gasping for breath
and I think that is the bit they don't want to know... with lung
cancer people automatically think you've brought it on yourself
and it's a sort of stigma. (LC29, retired community support
worker, aged 56, recruited through support group)
Even though mesothelioma is known to be
caused by asbestos particles, patients share the stigma of a
self-inflicted disease:
I think all people with lung cancer are
stigmatised, especially if they're smokers, and those that
aren't generally blame it on the smokers for their passive
smoking. So everybody feels that lung cancer, I believe anyway,
is self-inflicted. But you could say that about any illness.
Every illness, or almost every illness is self-inflicted in some
way or another so, but the stigma is definitely to do with
smoking. (LC18, retired welder, aged 55, recruited through
support group)
Doctors as well as friends and family
seemed to assume that a patient's lung cancer was caused by
smoking even if he or she had stopped smoking years ago or never
smoked. One man, despite never smoking, recalled negative
attitudes at the hospital when he had his operation:
I think cancer does have a stigma attached
to it... I think all lung cancer patients are stigmatised
because of smoking... When I went to see an oncologist for
further treatments because I'd had an operation and I'd had half
of my left lung removed, I asked them what he thought had caused
it and he just laughed and said, “That's obvious, through
smoking.” And my wife who was with me at the time, and we've
been together since we were 14, she just said, “Well he's never
smoked.” So right away what annoyed me as well as that, on my
medical records I'm classed as a smoker and every time I ever
went for review after that they would ask me, “Are you still
smoking?” because that's down there. And no matter how I told
them, I'd say, “Look I don't want that on there, I never
smoked,” it's only my word that can go against that. (LC15,
retired joiner, aged 56, recruited through support group)Even
though this patient had never smoked he felt responsible for his
disease. He was sure that he must have done something wrong and
felt deeply ashamed because he could no longer provide for his
family. He imagined others looked at him as a “leper.” This also
had financial consequences because he refused to tell tribunal
judges that he had had lung cancer and consequently failed to
obtain tax relief.
We found a few “deviant cases” (those who
denied feeling stigmatised or blamed for their illness),
particularly among older patients. One man with small cell lung
cancer volunteered:
Nobody has actually come out to me and said
“you see that's the penalties of being a smoker,” nobody has
ever said that to me, nobody. (LC13, retired electrician, aged
67, recruited through support group)
Older people are less likely to be blamed
for having lung cancer than younger people. Perhaps it is
remembered that older people became addicted to cigarettes when
smoking was socially accepted and before the dangers were widely
known. It is possible that others knew this patient had worked
with asbestos in the boiler room of ships and saw this as a
possible cause of his illness.
Resistance to blame and stigmatisation
Some patients accepted that smoking had
caused their lung cancer. Many others, particularly those who
had joined support groups, insisted that other factors could
have played a part—for example, diesel fumes, carbon monoxide,
spray paint, asbestos, pollution, diet, stress, and bereavement.
Some smokers and ex-smokers resisted stigmatisation and blamed
the tobacco industry:
Basically lung cancer patients find
themselves in the position where they feel that they've caused
it all themselves... They don't get funding like other cancers
get and probably that's because we feel that it's our fault. But
at the end of the day it's not our fault it's the tobacco
manufacturers' fault for putting the carcinogens in in the first
place. (LC09, retired accounts assistant, aged 55, recruited
through support group)
One woman, who thought sure that her cancer
had been caused by trauma at work, was angry that she was held
responsible for her disease:
But it [smoking] was fashion in the
sixties, it was fashion, you went along with it and once you're
on it you can't get off it (laughs). But a lot of people, even
now when you say, “Oh I had lung cancer,” they look at you and
say “Did you smoke?”... people automatically think you've
brought it on yourself and it's a sort of a stigma. (LC29,
retired community support worker, aged 56, recruited through
support group)
An elderly woman commented that her
consultant had resisted the tendency to blame her for her lung
cancer:
Interviewee: Do you ever think what might
have caused the lung cancer?
Respondent: Well I don't really know. I
mean even the specialist said that, I said to him “What have I
done?” I mean I know smoking doesn't help but I mean he said,
“It's not only smoking,” he said, “It could be other things like
food or you know like in the air or like from exhaust from
cars,” and nobody can put their finger on it I don't think.
(LC34, retired shop assistant, aged 68, recruited through
support group)
Peto and coworkers showed that stopping
smoking confers substantial benefit. They concluded that “even
people who stop smoking at 50 or 60 years of age avoid most of
their subsequent risk of developing lung cancer.” Many of our
participants had started smoking at a time when smoking was
socially acceptable and when tobacco was even provided free
during national service. Some had stopped smoking 20-30 years
ago; others had never smoked. Thus they felt upset that that
they were being blamed for their disease. One man said he had
heard that if people gave up smoking for five years they were
“clear,” and that “your chances were much improved.”
Some participants criticised the national
press for suggesting that patients are to blame for having lung
cancer:
When you see it reported in the press
there's a blame to it, as if, “Well you've smoked, so it's your
own fault that you got cancer.” Which is rather stupid really,
because we all do things right or wrong or whatever, but you're
not going to blame other people for getting their illnesses. So
I don't think it's a fair way of reporting this. (LC32, postman,
aged 52, recruited through support group)
Fears about lack of access to medical care
Patients generally spoke highly of their
doctors and nurses, but some were concerned about delays in
diagnosis. One man with mesothelioma asserted that delays occur
because doctors fail to take a “smoker's cough” seriously:
The first time you go to the doctor's with
a bad cough and coughing up phlegm in the mornings the doctor
will almost certainly say to you, “Do you smoke?” and once
you've said yes, you're sent packing with a bottle of cough
medicine. If you went to the doctor's with a small lump the size
of a pea on your breast you'd be straight into the hospital but
you can be coughing up phlegm for years and nobody will offer
you a hospital appointment... you are just pushed to the back of
the queue. And it's quite unfair really, people who go with
problems with drink related or people who fall off a cliff
through rock climbing are not stigmatised the same way that
smokers are. (LC18, retired welder, aged 55, recruited through
support group)
Another woman recalled her terror when she
overheard that smokers might be refused treatment:
But at first I were terrified, really
terrified that they wouldn't... They'd say, “That's it,” you
know. Or, they wouldn't say, “That's it,” but they wouldn't
offer me anything because they couldn't treat me... I'm sure it
had been on television that, because of the state national
health were in, and, you know, they needed that much money, that
people with diseases or who caused their own problems were going
to stop getting treated. (LC35, retired clerk, aged 59,
recruited through support group)
Others suggested that the government
allocates less money for screening and research for lung cancer
because of the link with smoking:
If you compare the amount of money that's
allocated to breast cancer for research and screening programmes
and so forth and compare that with those of lung cancer there is
a huge difference, there is a massive difference to the point
where one has to ask the question, “Why is there such a
difference?”, and you know I can only assume that it's because
it's self-inflicted and it's because it's smoking related.
(LC12, retired rigger, aged 43, recruited through support group)
Members of support groups were particularly passionate about
felt and enacted stigma caused by the association of lung cancer
with smoking. One of the benefits of support groups may be to
help members resist stigmatisation and victim blaming. Although
patients who had not joined support groups gave examples of
stigma, these were related to social factors and not to clinical
encountersDiscussion
The stigma attached to lung cancer, both
“felt” and “enacted,” can have a serious effect on people's
lives. Social interaction with friends and families may suffer,
and fear of disclosure may affect people financially or prevent
them from seeking support. Self-image may be seriously affected,
particularly if patients have to stop work, and some fear that
smokers will be denied treatment.
Almost all participants agreed to be video
recorded for our website (www.dipex.org),
although a few opted to remain anonymous through written or
audio means. It might be expected that participants willing to
be interviewed about their experiences would be less likely to
feel stigma than most patients with lung cancer. We therefore
suspect that the pattern of stigma we identified may be stronger
in the wider population of patients with lung cancer.
Just over half the participants were
recruited through support groups, and most of those who
discussed stigma were members of these groups. Support groups
discuss issues such as doctors' assumptions about smoking and
the cause of lung cancer, and although members may be seen as
biased it is likely that they also have a raised awareness of
victim blaming. Opportunity to reflect on their experiences with
others does not necessarily make their experiences atypical.
Patients who do not join support groups may also experience
stigma. They may make the decision not to disclose their illness
to others because they have experienced stigma when talking to
others about their cancer or another disease.
It
is now recognised that people can become highly dependent on
tobacco and that complete smoking cessation may be difficult,
but as one author noted “the tendency in medicine—especially in
general practice and health education—is to implicate the
sufferer in the generation of the disease or injury.” A few
respondents were sure that asbestos had caused their cancer, and
others believed that stress, trauma, pollution, or other
chemicals were partly to blame. It is not surprising therefore
that they felt angry and upset when they perceived that they
were being blamed for their disease. The Roy Castle Lung Cancer
Foundation is named after an entertainer who was a non-smoker
and who was believed to have developed lung cancer from
prolonged exposure to passive smoking in his work environment
What is already known on this topic
Lung cancer is strongly associated with
smoking, but little is known about the way in which patients
respond to this association
What this study adds
Patients with lung cancer perceive that
they are particularly stigmatised because others associate their
disease with smoking and dirt and because patients die in an
unpleasant way
This stigmatisation can have serious
consequences such as deterring patients from seeking support
Media reports may have added to the stigma
surrounding lung cancer
Some patients resist victim blaming, stress the culpability of
the tobacco industry, and propose several causes of their
disease, often related to pollutants at work
The rising cost of the NHS preoccupies government ministers. A
recent Labour party national policy forum paper stated that
overweight people and heavy smokers may one day have to sign
contracts promising to diet or give up cigarettes in return for
treatment. This has alarmed some patients who already perceive a
disparity between the resources for lung cancer and those for
conditions not considered self-inflicted. Some may need
reassurance that they will not be abandoned by health
professionals.
Studies that show the health benefits of
giving up smoking by early middle age were not based on working
class smokers, who may have been exposed to environmental
pollutants as well as tobacco smoke. Those participants who had
given up smoking many years ago often suspected that exposure to
pollutants at work had at least contributed to their cancer.
Although policy documents acknowledge the
role of social disadvantage in persisting health inequalities,
campaigns still usually focus on individual responsibility for
health. Policy measures such as free nicotine replacement
therapy are intended to help low income groups to stop smoking,
but government funded media campaigns routinely feature patients
with lung cancer regretting their decision to smoke and facing a
particularly unpleasant death. This may contribute to a
persisting image of not only personal responsibility for smoking
related diseases but also victim blaming.
Efforts must be made to prevent young people from smoking, and
smokers should be encouraged to stop as early as possible, but
there is a dilemma for antismoking campaigns and for clinicians
who take seriously their responsibility to deter people from
smoking and to encourage smokers to stop. Those who produce
images of “dirty lungs” rightly aim to put young people off
tobacco, but such images may upset people with smoking related
illness. In contrast, publicity about the Machiavellian role of
the global tobacco industry may resonate with young people while
avoiding further victim blaming of those with lung cancer and
other smoking related diseases
References
Goffman E.
Stigma.
Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1963.
Scambler G.
Perceiving and coping with stigmatizing illness. In: Fitzpatrick
R, Hinton J, Newman S, Scambler G, Thompson J, eds.
The experience of illness.
London: Tavistock, 1984: 203-26.
Williams S.
Goffman, interactionism, and the management of stigma in
everyday life. In: Scambler G, ed.
Sociological theory and medical
sociology. London:
Tavistock, 1987.
Ablon J. The
nature of stigma and medical conditions.
Epilepsy Behav
2002;3:
S2-9.
Fife B,
Wright E. The dimensionality of stigma: a comparison of its
impact on the self of persons with HIV/AIDS and cancer.
J Health Soc Behav
2000;41:
51-67.
Schneider J,
Conrad P. Having
epilepsy: the experience and control of illness.
Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1983.
Albrecht G,
Walker V, Levy J. Social distance from the stigmatized: a test
of two theories. Soc
Sci Med 1982;16:
1319-27.
Weiner B,
Perry R, Magnusson J. An attributional analysis of reactions to
stigmas. J Pers Soc
Psychol 1988;55:
738-48.
Muzzin L,
Anderson N, Figueredo A, Gudelis S. The experience of cancer.
Soc Sci Med
1994;38:
1201-8.
Sontag S.
Illness as metaphor.
New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, 1978.
MacDonald L.
The experience of stigma: living with rectal cancer. In:
Anderson R, Bury M, eds.
Living with chronic illness: the
experience of patients and their families.
London: Allen and Unwin, 1988.
Waskul D,
van der Riet P. The abject embodiment of cancer patients:
dignity, selfhood and the grotesque body.
Symbolic Interact
2002;25:
487-513.
Frank A.
The wounded
storyteller: body, illness and ethics,
London: University of Chicago Press, 1995.
Rosman S.
Cancer and stigma: experience of patients with
chemotherapy-induced alopecia.
Patient Educ Couns
2004;52:
333-9.
Frank AW.
At the will of the
body: reflections on illness.
New York: Houghton Mifflin, 1991.
Peto R,
Darby S, Deo H, Silcocks P, Whitley E, Doll R. Smoking, smoking
cessation, and lung cancer in the UK since 1950: combination of
national statistics with two case-control studies.
BMJ
2000;321:
323-9.
The A.
Palliative care and
communication: experiences in the clinic.
Buckingham: Open University Press, 2002.
Murray E,
Grant E, Grant A, Kendall M. Dying from cancer in developed and
developing countries: lessons from two qualitative interview
studies of patients and their carers.
BMJ
2003;326:
368-71.
Menec V,
Perry R. Reactions to stigmas.
J Aging Health
1995;7:
365-83.
Coyne I.
Sampling in qualitative research. Purposeful and theoretical
sampling; merging or clear boundaries?
J Adv Nurs
1997;26:
623-30.
Pope C,
Ziebland S, Mays N. Analysing qualitative data.
BMJ
2000;320:
114-6.
Richards L,
Richards T. The transformation of qualitative method:
computational paradigms and research processes. In: Fielding N,
Lee R, eds. Using
computers in qualitative research.
London: Sage, 1993: 38-53.
Tesch R.
Qualitative research:
analysis types and software tools.
New York: Falmer, 1991.
Malterud K.
Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines.
Lancet
2001;358:
483-8.
Morse JM.
“Perfectly healthy but dead:” the myth of inter-rater
reliability. Qual
Health Res 1997;7:
445-7.
Douglas M.
Purity and danger: an
analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo.
London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1966.
White C.
Annual deaths from mesothelioma in Britain to reach 2000 by
2010. BMJ
2003;326:
1417.
Silverman D.
Interpreting
qualitative data.
London: Sage, 1994.
Fowler G.
Proven strategies for smoking cessation.
Eur J Public Health
2000;10(suppl
3): 3-4.
Bellaby P.
What is genuine sickness? The relation between work-discipline
and the sick role in a pottery factory.
Sociol Health Illness
1990;12:
47-68.
Moore A.
Shape up or ship out?
Health Serv J 2003;12
Jun: 12-3.
Department
of Health. Our
healthier nation.
London: Stationery Office, 1998. (Cm 3852.).
Chambers J. Being strategic about smoking.
BMJ
1999;318: 1-2
|