Out of sight
and out of mind
http://www.howsthat.co.uk/
Shutting your
eyes won't make the problem go away, as Tracy Barnes
explains.
One of this year's themes for World AIDS Day is Out of
sight - Out of Mind - Stigma and Complacency. The year 2000
saw the highest number of new infections since recording
began. Improvements in treatments has lead to people with
HIV living longer, with much improved health. Evidence
points to increased complacency.
Unprotected sex is indicated in increased infections of
HIV and other STIs. The significant number of teenage
pregnancies are a good indicator of the problem of
unprotected teenage sex.
This article is predominantly based on the findings of the
"HIV and AIDS-related stigmatisation, discrimination and
denial: forms, contexts and determinants"; report published
by UNAIDS in June 2000. The report was commissioned to
explore the roots of HIV/AIDS-related stigma, discrimination
and denial and to provide some insight into the experience
of HIV-positive people.
Stigma is probably the biggest barrier to combating the
HIV epidemic - creating and supporting an environment that
fosters new infections, reluctance to testing and disclosing
status and reluctance to access treatment, care and support,
subsequently impacting at both an individual and societal
level.
Worldwide, the HIV epidemic has brought out the best and
the worst in people. The best has been seen in the
solidarity, support and care for people living with HIV and
AIDS. The worst has been seen in the way individuals and
groups have been stigmatised and marginalised by
individuals, communities and institutions, usually as a
consequence of ignorance or fear of a perceived threat.
Stigma associated with HIV/AIDS has resulted in serious
and often tragic consequences, denying people living with
HIV/AIDS access to treatments, services and support as well
as making it hard for prevention work to take place.
Erving Goffman (1963), a prominent sociologist, defined
stigma as a "significantly discrediting" attribute possessed
by a person with an "undesired difference".
Stigma does not exist naturally, it is created by
individuals and by communities and underpins the process of
devaluation and discrimination.
Historically, the real or supposed contagiousness of a
disease has resulted in the isolation and exclusion of those
infected. Sexually transmitted infections in particular are
notorious for triggering negative responses and reactions.
HIV/AIDS-related stigma builds upon and reinforces
existing prejudices. It also plays into, and strengthens,
existing social inequalities - especially those of gender,
sexuality and race.
While certain social groups such as homosexuals, injecting
drug users, sex workers and migrants have experienced stigma
for some time, the emergence of HIV/AIDS has reinforced the
established stigma.
Factors which contribute to HIV/AIDS-related stigma
include:
-
HIV/AIDS is a life-threatening disease;
-
People are afraid of contracting HIV;
-
The
disease has been associated with already stigmatised
behaviours (e.g. homosexuality and injecting drug use)
-
People living with HIV are often considered responsible
for contracting the disease
-
The
moral or religious belief that sees HIV/AIDS as a result
of deviance that is deserving of punishment
Stigma can be distinguished between felt and enacted
stigma. Feelings individuals hold about their condition and
the anticipated reactions of others is far more prevalent
than enacted stigma, which refers to the action of
stigmatisation and discrimination.
Evidence has shown that stigma exists and operates at
several levels, but is felt most harshly by individuals.
Stigma creates environments whereby individuals feel
devalued, ashamed and subsequently isolated. In extreme
cases individuals may withdraw completely, with significant
implications for mental health, sometimes resulting in
suicide.
Stigmatising environments discourage individuals to
present for testing, disclosure, treatment, care and
support: this impacts both at an individual and societal
level.
In addition, stigma creates environments that
significantly hinder the effectiveness of health promotion
and prevention activities. Individuals who identify
themselves as not belonging to the 'stigmatised' group
consequently may not consider themselves vulnerable and
therefore ignore or reject information and actions designed
to safeguard individual and public health. Those who belong
to marginalized and/or minority groups may also worry about
the reactions of others, regardless of their status.
Stigma assigned to women is particularly acute in some
communities. All too often women are economically,
culturally and socially disadvantaged with inequitable
access to treatment, financial support and education.
Historically women have often been perceived as the main
vectors of sexually transmitted infections.
HIV-positive women in developing countries are likely to
be treated very differently to HIV-positive men. In India
HIV-positive women are often blamed and abandoned by their
husbands and wider family members. Reports of African women
being blamed for the deaths of their HIV-positive husbands,
often resulting in eviction from their home, are not
uncommon either. In December 1998 Gugu Dhlamini was stoned
and beaten to death by neighbours in her township near
Durban, South Africa, after speaking openly on World AIDS
Day about her HIV status. Not surprisingly, some women
prefer to remain ignorant or secretive of their HIV-status.
As a consequence, individual denial of risk and
vulnerability is not an uncommon response to the epidemic.
At a societal level laws, rules, policies and procedures
may result in the stigmatisation of individuals. Legislation
in various countries which has sought to control the actions
of HIV-positive individuals have included:
-
Compulsory screening and testing of 'risk groups' and
individuals;
-
The
prohibition of HIV-positive individuals from certain
occupations;
-
The
medical examination, isolation, detention and compulsory
treatment of infected individuals;
-
Limitations on international travel and migration;
-
The
restriction of certain behaviours such as injecting drug
use and prostitution.
While restrictive and coercive measures are frequently
undertaken to protect society from infection and are often
justified in the interest of public health, they
discriminate against those already infected. Experience has
shown that such measures increase stigma and marginalisation
and may lead to the increased social exclusion of those
infected and those most vulnerable to infection.
Addressing Stigma and Discrimination
The human rights framework provides mechanisms for
enforcing the rights of people living with HIV and AIDS.
Freedom from discrimination is a fundamental human right
founded on the principles of natural justice and applies to
people everywhere. Non-discrimination is central to human
rights legislation and practice.
The London Declaration on AIDS Prevention back in 1988
recognised that:
"Discrimination against, and stigmatisation of,
HIV-infected people and people with AIDS and population
groups undermine public health and must be avoided."
Between 1988 and 1991 subsequent resolutions from the
World Health Assembly, the United Nations Centre for Human
Rights and the United Nations General Assembly have all
underpinned the need to discourage discrimination and
stigmatisation experienced at a personal level and thus
protect the human rights of affected individuals and groups.
In addition, there has been increased recognition of the
barrier stigma and discrimination can present to public
health messages and activities and subsequent reduction in
transmission rates.
In 1996 the United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS and
Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights convened a
consultation on HIV and human rights.
From this consultation 12 international guidelines on
HIV/AIDS and human rights were drafted, the majority of
which reiterated the need to promote and protect the rights
of people living with and affected by HIV/AIDS.
The United Nations Commission of Human Rights Resolution
49/1999 reaffirms that:
Discrimination on the basis of HIV or AIDS status, actual
or perceived, is prohibited by existing international human
rights standards, and that the term 'or other status' in
non-discrimination provisions in international human rights
texts should be interpreted to cover health status,
including HIV/AIDS."
The resolution encourages states, UN agencies and treaty
bodies,
inter-governmental organisations and non-governmental
organisations to combat HIV-related discrimination,
prejudice and stigma and to monitor and enforce HIV/AIDS
human rights.
Stigmatising thoughts often lead people to the denial of
services or entitlements to others, thus resulting in
discrimination.
Discrimination occurs when a distinction is made against
an individual or group and results in unfair and unjust
treatment on the basis of their belonging, or being
perceived to belong, to a particular group.
Stigma and subsequent discrimination often leads to the
rights of those people living with HIV/AIDS and their
families being violated.
People living with HIV may be stigmatised, not just because
they are
HIV-positive but also by the way their status may be
perceived by others. For example, perceptions that being
HIV-positive may indicate promiscuity, homosexuality or
criminal behaviour can result in a double stigmatisation.
Experience has shown that two complementary strategies
are necessary to address both stigma and discrimination.
-
Strategies that prevent stigma or prejudicial thoughts
being formed
-
Strategies that address or redress the situation when
stigma persists.
|